Site Map | Search | Terms & Conditions - PAIA
Company Profile | Products | Support | Contact Us | Community
...facilitating access to information
Legal | Electronic Publications | Online Reference | Collection Management | Library Systems | Cataloguing | Interlending | Client Access
HomeProductsElectronic Publications (Online Journals) Abstract Information
JournalsElectronic Publishing
Abstract Info
Latest issues added
More on this service
Subscription FAQ
Collections

Abstract Information

Defending a diagnostic pariah : validating the categorisation of Dissociative Identity Disorder

  • Journal Title: South African Journal of Psychology
  • Volume: Volume 39
  • Issue:  Issue 3
  • Publication Date: 2009
  • Pages: 347  - 356
  • Authors:  Craig M. Traub;
  • ISSN: 00812463
  • Abstract:  In past decades and still, in contemporary society, the notion and validity of the phenomenon of multiple personalities, or dissociative identities, within a single individual, have resulted in much debate and discord among mental health care professionals. Even with diverging opinions on the subject, the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders bears proof of the genuine nature of what is now termed Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). In this paper, the existence of DID per se is not questioned, but rather, whether this disorder can be reliably identified and validly categorised. There are four factors that will be assessed: childhood trauma, prevalence ratings, media influences, and psycho-physiological perspectives. First, traumatic experiences in childhood are commonly held to be the primary cause of this disorder; however, issues arise with regard to the intensity, duration and kind of abuse, as well as the measures in recording such abuse. Second, the prevalence ratings highlight the dramatic increase of diagnosis in the 1980s, with perspectives supporting both an under- and over-diagnosis of the disorder. Third, vast media influences may have played a role in the over-diagnosis of DID, such that the number of cases alters per person, and rates of ritual satanic abuse increased dramatically, with subsequent sharp decline. Last, psychophysiological experimental studies may suggest the validity of this diagnostic category, but these studies may also merely demonstrate the ability for intense concentration and / or a desire for roleplay. In essence, evidence either supporting or opposing the validity of current categorisation of this disorder seems to be unconvincing and inconclusive. However, depending on the perceived ontology of this disorder, further study may be directed toward parental coping strategies to reduce child abuse or mandatory warnings to practitioners on the susceptibility of certain patients.
  • Read this article

For subscription and additional information please contact us on:

  • Tel: +27 12 643-9500
  • email: info@sabinet.co.za
  • alternatively you can complete this form and one of our portfolio managers will contact you!

Top
Sabinet Online Ltd. is Proudly South AfricanCompany Profile | Products | Support | Contact Us | Community
P O Box 9785 Centurion 0046 | info@sabinet.co.za | 0800 11 85 95
Copyright © Sabinet Online Ltd 2008. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Conditions. PAIA.