<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_litstud.html">
    <title>Journal of Literary Studies : Aspects of South African Literary Studies : Special Issue (07/07/2010)</title>
    <link>http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_litstud.html</link>
    <description>A Sabinet RSS feed with the latest modified articles for each journal.</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a1.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a2.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a3.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a4.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a5.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a6.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a7.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a8.pdf" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a1.pdf">
    <title>Introduction</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a1.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Oliphant, Andries Walter
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.234-236&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a2.pdf">
    <title>Nonidentity and reciprocity in conceptualising South African literary studies</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a2.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Oliphant, Andries Walter
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.237-254&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a3.pdf">
    <title>"The Foot Does Not Sniff" : imagining the post-anti-apartheid intellectual</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a3.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Titlestad, Michael
Kissack, Mike
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.255-270&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The South African literary institution is engaged in an examination of both its role in the
history of apartheid and its potential futures. Originating in Edward Said's search for an
alternative to a "politics of blame", this article considers recent attempts to explore the
possibility of "secular interpretation" in (and of) the South African context. Leon de
Kock's trope of "the seam" and Mark Sanders's notion of "complicity" are considered.
We characterise both as postdialectical descriptions of the interconnections that define
South African (multivalent) being and mark its inscription. Further, we suggest that their
postdialectical turn, despite the authors' primary concern with the history of identity and
historiography, advocates a persuasive mode of scholarship for engaging contemporary
South African identity.
 &lt;br&gt;Leaving the domain of scholarly debate, we turn to a literary representation of the
contemporary South African intellectual. We look at the figure of Camagu in Zakes
Mda's &lt;I&gt;The Heart of Redness&lt;/I&gt; (2000) in the belief that he, caught as he is between
contending cults of interpretation, embodies something of the practice of secular critique
sought by Said, De Kock, and Sanders. Through Camagu, we maintain, it is possible
for us to describe aspects of the dilemma of the "post-&lt;I&gt;anti&lt;/I&gt;-apartheid" intellectual as well
as the potential of a nondialectical engagement with both our past and our present.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Die Suid-Afrikaanse literêre instelling is gemoeid met 'n ondersoek na die rol van die
geskiedenis van apartheid en sy potensiële toekomste. Hierdie artikel, wat sy oorsprong
het in Said se soeke na 'n alternatief vir 'n "politiek van blaam", oorweeg resente
pogings om die moontlikheid van "sekulêre interpretasie" in (en van) die Suid-
Afrikaanse konteks te ondersoek. Leon de Kock se uitdrukking, nl. die "las" ("the seam")
en Mark Sanders se idee van komplisiteit word oorweeg. Ons karakteriseer albei as
postdialektiese beskrywings van die interkonneksies wat die Suid-Afrikaanse
(multivalente) wese definieer en sy inskripsie kenskets. Verder suggereer ons dat hulle
postdialektiese keerpunt, ten spyte van die outeurs se primêre saak met die geskiedenis
van identiteit en historiografie, 'n oortuigende modus van vakkundigheid voorstaan
om die Suid-Afrikaanse identiteit aan te neem.
 &lt;br&gt; Ons laat vaar die wetenskaplike debat en wend ons tot 'n literêre voorstelling van die
kontemporêre Suid-Afrikaanse intellektueel. Ons beskou die figuur Camagu in Zakes
Mda se &lt;I&gt;The Heart of Redness&lt;/I&gt; (2000) in die mening dat hy, vasgevang soos hy is
tussen strydende kultusse van interpretasie, iets van die praktyk van sekulêre kritiek wat
deur Said, De Kock, en Sanders nagestreef word, verpersoonlik. Ons voer aan dat dit
deur Camagu vir ons moontlik is om aspekte van die dilemma van die "post-&lt;I&gt;anti&lt;/I&gt;-
 apartheid" intellektueel en ook die potensiaal van 'n nie-dialektiese verbintenis met
sowel ons verlede as ons hede te beskryf.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a4.pdf">
    <title>Reading against race : J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace, Justin Cartwright's White Lightning and Ivan Vladislavi&amp;#263;'s The Restless Supermarket</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a4.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Marais, Mike
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.271-289&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In this essay, I argue that the treatment of race that one finds in J.M Coetzee's &lt;i&gt;Disgrace&lt;/i&gt; (1999), Justin Cartwright's &lt;i&gt;White Lightning&lt;/i&gt; (2002) and Ivan Vladislavi&amp;#263;'s &lt;i&gt;The Restless Supermarket&lt;/i&gt; (2001), is premised on a recognition of the discursive inscription of the category of race in culture. These novels ponder the implications of the cultural basis of this trope by asking, for instance, whether nonracialism is a possibility that is open to the individual in a social context in which discourses of race prevail and, if not, how the individual may counter them. My essay examines not only the ways in which the novels under consideration articulate these questions, but also how they respond to them through a foregrounding of the culturally determined nature of reading.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In hierdie artikel voer ek aan dat die behandeling van ras wat aangetref word in J.M.Coetzee se &lt;i&gt;Disgrace&lt;/i&gt; (1999), Justin Cartwright se &lt;i&gt;White Lightning&lt;/i&gt; (2002) en Vladislavi&amp;#263; se &lt;i&gt;The Restless Supermaket&lt;/i&gt; (2001) van die vooronderstelling van 'n erkenning van die diskursiewe inskripsie van die kategorie ras in kultuur uitgaan. Hierdie romans oorweeg die implikasies van die kulturele basis van hierdie troop deur byvoorbeeld te vra of nierassehaat 'n moontlikheid is wat oop is vir die individu in 'n sosiale konteks waarin diskoers oor ras algemeen is, en indien nie, hoe die individu dit kan teenwerk. My artikel ondersoek nie slegs die wyses waarop tersaaklike romans hierdie vrae artikuleer nie, maar ook hoe hulle reageer op hierdie vrae deur die kultureel bepaalde aard van interpretasie op die voorgrond te bring.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a5.pdf">
    <title>Postcolonial ecologies and the gaze of animals : reading some contemporary Southern African narratives</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a5.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Woodward, Wendy
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.290-315&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; This essay is located within the new field of Animal Studies, and foregrounds literary
representations of animals within a historicised culture, while stressing that ecologies
are inseparable from politics and culture. Three southern African writers, Mda, Vera and
Couto, contradict colonial discursivities about nature in their postcolonial texts. Their
representations of human-animal relationships will be discussed, to some extent, in
relation to Derridean conceptualising of the animal gaze and the human response to
being addressed by an animal. But because Derrida has animals as "the absolute other"
the writers implicitly interrogate his theorising, for he cannot acknowledge what Adams
calls "relational epistemologies". African knowledges, as Mda and Vera represent them,
construct such epistemologies for humans along with cattle, horses and "wild" animals.
Couto, contradictorily, represents the repercussions of a breakdown of such epistemologies
because of violence and poverty. Poland has humans responding to the literal
animal gaze, as well as engaging extensively with African knowledges of cattle.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Hierdie artikel val binne die veld Dierestudies, en plaas literêre voorstellings van diere
binne 'n gehistoriseerde kultuur, terwyl dit beklemtoon dat ekologieë onlosmaaklik van
politiek en kultuur is. Drie skrywers van suidelike Afrika, Mda, Vera en Couto, weerspreek
koloniale diskursiwiteit omtrent die natuur in hulle postkoloniale tekste. Hulle
voorstellings van mens-dier verhoudings sal bespreek word, in 'n sekere mate, in
verhouding tot die Derrideaanse konseptualisering van die dier se blik en die mens se
respons daarop om deur 'n dier aangespreek te word. Maar omdat Derrida diere as die
"absolute ander" daarstel, ondervra die skrywers sy teoretisering, want hy kan nie
toegee vir wat Adams noem "verhoudings-epistemologieë" nie. Afrika-begrippe, soos
Mda en Vera hulle voorstel, konstrueer hierdie epistemologieë vir diere tesame met
beeste, perde en "wilde" diere. Couto, daarenteen, stel die reperkussies voor van 'n
ineenstorting van hierdie epistemologieë as gevolg van geweld en armoede. Poland stel
mense daar wat reageer op die letterlike blik van die dier, en ekstensief Afrika-begrippe
van beeste aanneem.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a6.pdf">
    <title>Appropriating space and transcending boundaries in The Africa House by Christina Lamb and Ways of Dying by Zakes Mda</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a6.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Wenzel, Marita
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.316-330&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The appropriation of space and construction of shelter is part of the human endeavour
to conceptualise being &lt;I&gt;in and of the world&lt;/I&gt;. Places are defined spaces that serve as
points of orientation, with the implication that space exists where humans are and vice
versa. Houses, in particular, feature as places or sites that occupy and define personal
space; they are not only adapted to a person's lifestyle and indicative of his/her identity
but also serve as metaphors of certain periods and value systems. A comparison of &lt;I&gt;The
Africa House&lt;/I&gt; (2000) by Christina Lamb and &lt;I&gt;Ways of Dying&lt;/I&gt; (1995) by Zakes Mda
explores the concept of houses as constructs of identity and illustrates how they could
be perceived to identify and reflect the cultural boundaries and imaginative worlds of
their periods of origin and authors.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Die toe-eiening van ruimte en oprigting van skuilings vorm deel van die menslike poging
om sy/haar bestaan in en verbintenis tot die wêreld te begryp. Plekke vorm duidelik
omlynde ruimtes wat dien as oriënteringspunte, met die veronderstelling dat ruimte
bestaan waar mense is en ook andersom. Huise word spesifiek as plekke of terreine
beskou wat persoonlike ruimte beset en definieer; hulle word nie slegs aangepas by 'n
persoon se leefstyl en is betekenend van sy/haar identiteit nie, maar dien ook as
metafore van spesifieke periodes en waardesisteme. 'n Vergelykende studie van &lt;I&gt;The
Africa House&lt;/I&gt; (2000) deur Christina Lamb en &lt;I&gt;Ways of Dying&lt;/I&gt; (1995) deur Zakes Mda,
verken die konsep van huise as konstruksies van identiteit en dui aan hoe hulle
terselfdertyd interpreteer kan word om die kulturele grense en denkbeeldige wêrelde
van hulle tye van oorsprong, en hulle skrywers te reflekteer.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a7.pdf">
    <title>Deconstructing empire in Joseph Conrad and Zakes Mda</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a7.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Sewlall, Harry
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.331-344&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The publication of Zakes Mda's &lt;I&gt;The Heart of Redness&lt;/I&gt; in 2000, almost a century after
Conrad's &lt;I&gt;Heart of Darkness&lt;/I&gt;, is not only redolent of its precursor in a titular sense, but
also in its contingent and contiguous themes. Viewed from a postcolonial/postmodern
perspective, both texts may be regarded as subversive offerings which disrupt colonial
configurations of subjectivity. The degree to which Conrad and Mda succeed in
deconstructing empire depends on the conditions of the historical production of their
respective texts. Located within a modernist sensibility,&lt;I&gt; Heart of Darkness&lt;/I&gt;, lacking the
deictic in Mda's title, captures a historical moment of existential crisis in a manner that
is simultaneously disruptive of colonial subjectivity and complicit with it, although in a
characteristically ambiguous and inconclusive way. Set in the next millennium,&lt;I&gt; The
Heart of Redness&lt;/I&gt; continues the task of destabilising empire begun by Conrad, but this
time through a revisionist reading of history, combining elements of realism with magic.
Whilst Mda's deconstruction of Western colonialism is unambiguous owing to the
writer's positioning in a postapartheid South Africa, his novel sardonically problematises
another brand of colonialism, that of the enriched elite in government structures.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Die publikasie van Zakes Mda se &lt;I&gt;The Heart of Redness&lt;/I&gt; in 2000, bykans 'n eeu na
Conrad se &lt;I&gt;Heart of Darkness&lt;/I&gt;, herinner nie alleen aan sy voorganger in 'n titulêre sin
nie, maar ook aan sy kontingente en aanliggende temas. Vanuit 'n post-koloniale/postmoderne
perspektief kan albei tekste beskou word as subversiewe aanbiedings wat
koloniale konfigurasies van subjektiwiteit ontwrig. Die mate waarin Conrad en Mda
daarin slaag om empire te dekonstrueer hang af van die omstandighede van die
historiese produksie van hulle onderskeie tekste. Gelokaliseer in 'n modernistiese
ontvanklikheid, en by gebreke aan die deiktiese in Mda se titel, gee &lt;I&gt;Heart of Darkness&lt;/I&gt;
'n historiese moment van eksistensiële krisis weer op 'n wyse wat koloniale subjektiwiteit
terselfdertyd omvergooi en ook daaraan aandadig is, ofskoon op 'n kenmerkend
dubbelsinnige en onoortuigende manier. Geplaas in die volgende millennium, sit &lt;I&gt;The
Heart of Redness&lt;/I&gt; die taak voort wat deur deur Conrad begin is om empire te
destabiliseer - maar hierdie keer deur 'n revisionistiese lees van geskiedenis, en deur
elemente van realisme en die magiese te kombineer. Waar Mda se dekonstruksie van
Westerse kolonialisme ondubbelsinnig is as gevolg van sy plasing in 'n postapartheid
Suid-Afika, problematiseer sy roman sardonies 'n ander skandteken van kolonialisme,
dié van die verrykte elite in regeringstrukture.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a8.pdf">
    <title>Translating Triomf : the shifting limits of "ownership" in literary translation, or : never translate anyone but a dead author</title>
    <link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/litstud/litstud_v19_n3_a8.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
De Kock, Leon
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol 19 Issue 3 &amp; 4&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2003&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; p.345-359&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; This essay teases out the paradoxes inherent in competing notions of (1) authorial
"ownership" of a text and of its modes of signification in acts of translation, (2) the
claims upon that text by a translator, and (3) the senses in which imaginative texts are
"co-owned" by readers, specialists, critics, teachers, reviewers and editors. Based on
anecdotal evidence - in this instance, an incomplete case-history of translating the
Afrikaans novel &lt;I&gt;Triomf&lt;/I&gt; into English - the essay builds an argument about the nature of
translation in more general terms.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Hierdie artikel pluis die paradokse uit wat inherent is aan die kompeterende begrippe
van (1) outeurs "eienaarskap" van die teks en van die betekenisgewing daaraan deur
vertaling, (2) die aansprake op die teks deur die vertaler, en (3) die sin waarin
oorspronklike tekse "medebesit" word deur lesers, spesialiste, kritici, leerkragte,
resensente en redakteurs. Aan die hand van anekdotiese gronde - in hierdie geval 'n
gedeeltelike gevalbeskrywing van die vertaling van die Afrikaanse roman &lt;I&gt;Triomf&lt;/I&gt; in
Engels - voer die essay 'n argument aan omtrent die aard van vertaling in meer
algemene terme.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T05:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

