<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_ju_assal.html">
    <title>Annual Survey of South African Law (13/02/2013)</title>
    <link>http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_ju_assal.html</link>
    <description>A Sabinet RSS feed with the latest modified articles for each journal.</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a1.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a2.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a3.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a4.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a5.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a6.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a7.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a8.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a9.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a10.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a11.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a12.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a13.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a14.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a15.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a16.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a17.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a18.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a19.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a20.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a21.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a22.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a23.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a24.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a25.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a26.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a27.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a28.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a29.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a30.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a31.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a32.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a33.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a34.pdf" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a1.pdf">
    <title>Table of statutes</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a1.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; ix-xix&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Table of statutes
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:15Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a2.pdf">
    <title>Table of cases</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a2.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; xxi-l&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Table of cases
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:15Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a3.pdf">
    <title>The administration of justice</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a3.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Davis, Dennis
Marcus, Gilbert
Klaaren, Jonathan
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1-24&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; On 7 October 2007, the &lt;i&gt;Sunday Times&lt;/i&gt; published an article authored by former  Supreme Court of Appeal and Constitutional Court Judge, Johann Kriegler, entitled 'Judge Hlophe betrayed the nation with his greed'. Remarkable in its frontal candour, the article called for Hlophe JP of the High Court in Cape Town to resign, because he was not a fit and proper person to be a judge.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:15Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a4.pdf">
    <title>Administrative law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a4.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Plasket, Clive
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 25-55&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; It is a regular feature of this chapter that substantial discussion is devoted to the case law on what is, and what is not, administrative action for purposes of the notoriously difficult definition of this term in section 1 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA). This year is no different.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:15Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a5.pdf">
    <title>Admiralty law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a5.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Stewart, Angus
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 56-66&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; During 2007, the Merchant Shipping (National Small Vessel Safety) Regulations, 2007 were brought into force in terms of section 356 of the Merchant Shipping Act 57 of 1951. They were published in GN R704 and GN R705 &lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30151 of 8 August 2007 and repealed the Regulations for the Use of Vessels of Less than Three Metres in Length, 1981 and the Merchant Shipping (Small Vessel Safety) Regulations, 2002.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:15Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a6.pdf">
    <title>Bill of Rights jurisprudence</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a6.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Du Plessis, Max
Penfold, Glenn
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 67-130&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The Bill of Rights does not only apply 'vertically' (as against the state); it also applies horizontally (between non-state actors). This is reflected in section 8(2) of  the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. It stipulates that the Bill of Rights 'binds a natural or a juristic person if, and to the extent that, it is applicable, taking into account the nature of the right and the nature of any duty imposed by the right'. This test is somewhat uncertain and does not always yield a positive answer. It is thus advantageous for a party seeking to challenge the constitutionality of conduct if the Bill of Rights applies 'vertically' to the matter at hand - it applies with full force to an entity without further ado. In this regard, section 8(1) provides, without qualification, that the Bill of Rights binds the legislature, the executive, the judiciary, and all 'organs of state'. An 'organ of state' is defined in section 239 of the Constitution as (a) a department of state or  administration; (b) a functionary or institution exercising a power or performing a function under the Constitution or a provincial constitution; or (c) a functionary or institution 'exercising a public power or performing a public function in terms of any legislation'. A significant aspect of the last  category is that it extends the concept of 'organ of state' beyond the state to other bodies that perform public functions or exercise public power (see, for example, &lt;i&gt;Inkatha Freedom Party &amp; another v Truth and Reconciliation Committee &amp; others&lt;/i&gt; 2000 (3) SA 119 (C) at 133).
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:15Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a7.pdf">
    <title>Civil and constitutional procedure and jurisdiction</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a7.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Hurter, Estelle
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 131-148&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; A wide range of matters presented themselves during the year under review. The infusion of constitutional values into the judgments of the courts continued unabated. This was particularly apparent in the field of the execution of immovable property. Change was also in the offing, as can be seen from the proposed legislation surveyed below and the Practice Directions of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Appeal's &lt;i&gt;Practice Directions&lt;/i&gt; (see 2007 (6) SA 1)  should be noted by practitioners. These directions deal with the postponement or settlement of an appeal; the withdrawal as attorney of record; the lodging of heads of argument; enrolment; the preparation of core bundle documents; heads of argument in cross-appeals; leave to appeal; documents of appeal; and communications from practitioners to the president of court or presiding judge. Finally, the Directions also stipulate the new mode of address in English as from 2 May 2007. The bench will now be addressed through the presiding judge and be referred to as 'the court'; an individual member of the bench is addressed by using the judge's surname preceded by the word 'judge'. The current form of address in Afrikaans remains unchanged.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:15Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a8.pdf">
    <title>Company law (including close corporations)</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a8.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Luiz, S.M.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 149-204&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Two new classifications of companies were introduced into the Companies Act with the inclusion of definitions of a 'widely held company' and a 'limited interest company'. The relevance of these classifications becomes apparent when the amendments to the provisions regulating auditors are considered (see below).&lt;br/&gt;A company is considered to be widely held if its articles provide for an unrestricted transfer of its shares, or its articles permit it to offer shares to the public,  or it resolves by special resolution to be a widely held company, or if it is a subsidiary  of a widely held company (s 1(6)(&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;)(i)-(iv)). A company is also a widely held company if it has two or more types or classes of shares and its articles provide for the unrestricted transfer of its shares in one or more of these types or classes (s 1(6)(&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;)). A company need thus comply with only one of the requirements specified in order to be classified as widely held. If it is not a widely held company, it is classified as a limited interest company (s 1(6)(&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;)). Most public companies will be classified as widely held and any private company that is a subsidiary of a widely held company will be considered to be widely held irrespective of what the articles of the subsidiary may provide.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a9.pdf">
    <title>Conflict of laws</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a9.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Schulze, Christian
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 205-210&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; This Act was briefly canvassed in the 2006 &lt;i&gt;Annual Survey&lt;/i&gt; 142-56. Certain sections of the Act came into operation on 1 July 2007. The enacted section 17 has lowered the age of majority in South African law from 21 years to eighteen years. This is relevant to the many young South Africans temporarily living abroad, who are either still domiciled in South Africa, or who are still South African citizens. If the conflict of laws rule of the foreign country in which they live points to domicile or nationality for the determination of personal status, those older than 18 years will now have full contractual capacity in accordance with South African law.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a10.pdf">
    <title>Constitutional law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a10.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Hofmeyr, Kate
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 211-240&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The background to the Constitutional Court's judgment in &lt;i&gt;AAA Investments (Pty) Ltd v Micro Finance Regulatory Council &amp; another&lt;/i&gt; 2007 (1) SA 343 (CC) is set  out below under 'Mootness'. In addition to its approach to mootness, the case is noteworthy for its treatment of the issue of delegated of legislative authority.&lt;br/&gt;The High Court had found that the rule-making power of the Micro Finance Regulatory Council was a legislative power that had not been properly delegated to the Council (para [46]).
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a11.pdf">
    <title>Constitutional property law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a11.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Van Der Walt, A.J.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 241-268&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In constitutional property law, state regulation of land use planning, development, building and the conservation of the environment is generally regarded as a legitimate exercise of state regulatory power (sometimes referred to as the police power). Consequently, regulatory deprivation of property is constitutionally unassailable, provided that the action is properly authorized, due process principles are adhered to, and the effects of the regulatory action are not  arbitrary, excessive, or disproportionately unfair. As far as South African law is concerned, constitutional control over state regulation of land use is restricted to the requirements in section 25(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 : the deprivation of property must be authorized by law of general application, and no law may permit arbitrary deprivation (see, generally, AJ van der Walt &lt;i&gt;Constitutional Property Law&lt;/i&gt; (2005) ch 4). According to general principles, regulation of land use can cause (even substantial) loss of property, but as long as the regulatory action is legitimate and fair, compensation is not payable for the deprivation. The exception is where a right to claim compensation for excessive regulatory deprivation is granted either by the constitution itself (Switzerland) or in judicial practice (the United States of America). If such a right to claim compensation for constructive expropriation (Switzerland) or regulatory takings (the United States) is not recognized, excessive regulatory deprivation is usually invalid for being unconstitutional. For the time being it seems unlikely that the doctrine of constructive expropriation will be adopted in South African law (Van der Walt op cit at 209-37). On the basis of case law and academic writing the situation in South African law is summarized by the Constitutional Court in &lt;i&gt;First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service; First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Minister of Finance&lt;/i&gt; 2002 (4) SA 768 (CC) (idem at 145-55): the deprivation of property resulting from state regulation of land use will be legitimate as long as it is properly authorized by legislation, complies with due process requirements, and is not arbitrary. In FNB, the court held that state regulatory action will be deemed non-arbitrary if there is sufficient reason for it.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a12.pdf">
    <title>Criminal law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a12.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Hoctor, S.V.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 269-306&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Though assented to on 8 December 2000, the commencement date of this Act was 2 July 2007. The purpose of the Act is to promote fair lending practices, which require disclosure by financial institutions of information regarding the provision of home loans. Contravention of or failure to comply with any provision of this Act is an offence (s 15). The Minister of Housing may exempt a financial institution or category of institutions from the disclosure requirements in terms of the Act for a period not exceeding one year (s 14).
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a13.pdf">
    <title>Criminal procedure</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a13.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Cowling, Michael G.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 307-392&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; As in the previous few years there have not been many legislative developments in the sphere of criminal procedure. An exception in this respect has been the enactment of the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Amendment Act 38 of 2007 which, in turn, introduced significant amendments to the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997. The latter was the forerunner of the minimum sentence legislation designed to ensure that courts imposed certain minimum sentences on persons convicted of specified offences.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a14.pdf">
    <title>Environmental law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a14.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Glazewski, Jan
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 393-427&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; South Africa attended and participated in a number of international meetings concerning environmental conventions and related matters during 2007.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a15.pdf">
    <title>Financial institutions and stock exchanges</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a15.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Schulze, W.G.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 428-468&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The Pension Funds Amendment Act 11 of 2007 ('the Amendment Act') came into operation on 13 September 2007 (Proc 26 &lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30297 of 13 September 2007). (For a summary of selected aspects of the Amendment Act, see Pieter Stassen &amp;  Koos Stassen 'New Legislation : Selected Aspects of the Pension Funds Amendment Act' Nov 2007 &lt;i&gt;De Rebus&lt;/i&gt; 39.) The Amendment Act is an interim measure only as Parliament envisages a complete revision of the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 ('the Act').
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a16.pdf">
    <title>General principles of the law of contract</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a16.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Pretorius, C-J.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 469-533&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Manna v Lotter &amp; another&lt;/i&gt; 2007 (4) SA 315 (C) specifically dealt with the disputed sale of immovable property, but an important aspect of the decision potentially pertains to contracts in general. The applicant (purchaser) made a written  offer to purchase the respondent's (seller's) property. However, the seller signed the offer to purchase, and thus accepted the offer, only after its expiry date. It seems that initially both parties believed that a binding agreement had been concluded, but when later called upon to sign the necessary transfer documents the seller failed to respond despite repeated efforts on the part of the attorneys attending to the transfer. Eventually matters came to a head more than a year later when the purchaser launched an application to compel specific performance of the deed of sale.  The seller proffered several defences, the main one of which was that the sale was void because the offer was accepted after it had lapsed.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a17.pdf">
    <title>Insolvency law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a17.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Smith, Alastair
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 534-561&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;SACCAWU v Master of the Supreme Court&lt;/i&gt; [2007] 4 All SA 1034 (T) concerned the appointment of provisional liquidators to companies in winding-up. In brief, the context of such appointments is that the relevant statutory amendments introduced in 2004 are not yet effective. The practice in the Master's Office in the Transvaal Provincial Division operates in terms of a requisition system and certain policy documents, neither of which has legal force. Under case law, the Master's exercise of  his discretion concerning the appointment of liquidators is unfettered and may be challenged in review proceedings on limited grounds. The Master's reasons for his decision may now be sought under a relatively new statute.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a18.pdf">
    <title>Insurance law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a18.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Van Niekerk, J.P.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 562-640&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The principal aim of an insurance contract, if it is one of indemnity, is to provide the insured with an indemnification against either the loss or damage it may suffer, or the liability it may incur towards third parties. However, contracts of a type other than insurance often contain an undertaking in terms of which the one party subsidiarily undertakes to indemnify the other party.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a19.pdf">
    <title>Intellectual property law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a19.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Kelbrick, Roshana
Geyer, Sunelle
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 641-657&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Litigation by a leading motor manufacturer, Bayerische Motoren WerkeAG (BMW), resulted in two important decisions by the Supreme Court of Appeal during the year under review. In these decisions Harms ADP reformulated what constitutes infringing use for purposes of section 34(1) of the Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a20.pdf">
    <title>Labour law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a20.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Van Jaarsveld, Marlize
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 658-766&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The EEA provides for fines if designated employers fail to observe the provisions of the EEA. However, the true impact of these financial measures were for the first time illuminated when the first number of decisions, dealing with employers who simply failed or chose to ignore to the inspectors of the Department of Labour' warning to comply with compliance orders, were reported during the year under review. &lt;i&gt;Director-General of the Department of Labour v Jinghua Garments (Pty) Ltd&lt;/i&gt; (2007) 28 ILJ 880 (LC) is the first reported decision to illustrate the dire consequences of an employer's failure to comply with its employment equity obligations. The respondent in &lt;i&gt;Jinghua&lt;/i&gt; failed to comply with several provisions of the EEA, in particular with a written undertaking it had given to a labour  inspector. The inspector issued a compliance order that the respondent also ignored. The inspector applied in the Labour Court for the compliance order to be made an order of the court, and also for a fine to be imposed. The employer having made several admissions regarding his failure to comply with his EEA obligations, the only issue before the court related to the fine.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a21.pdf">
    <title>The law of delict</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a21.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Neethling, Johann
Potgieter, Johan
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 767-843&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Mediterranean Shipping Co (Pty) Ltd v Tebe Trading (Pty) Ltd&lt;/i&gt; [2007] 2 All SA 489 (SCA) concerned two containers of litchis shipped on board a carrier at Durban destined for the Middle East. The respondent was the shipper and exporter of perishable fruit while the appellant was the agent of the carrier who issued the bills of lading. On arrival at the ports of discharge, the litchis were found to have deteriorated as a result of a delay in the completion of the voyage. The respondent sued the appellant in delict. The claim was based upon the alleged negligent failure of the appellant to advise the respondent of a delay in the commencement of the voyage and a change in the proposed route of the carrier to the ports of discharge. The trial court found for the appellant but this decision was reversed on appeal to the full bench. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a22.pdf">
    <title>The law of evidence</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a22.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Schwikkard, Pamela-Jane
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 844-870&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 was passed in December 2007. It makes significant and much needed changes to the  rules of evidence applicable in sexual offence cases.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a23.pdf">
    <title>The law of lease</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a23.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Naude, T.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 871-875&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The Limpopo Rental Housing Tribunal Regulations 2007 were published for comment in Notice 479 in &lt;i&gt;Gazette&lt;/i&gt; 1406 of 23 October 2007. No other legislation of importance affecting this branch of the law was assented to during 2007.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a24.pdf">
    <title>The law of negotiable instruments</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a24.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Pretorius, J.T.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 876-884&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The decision in &lt;i&gt;Melamed Finance (Pty) Ltd v VOC Investments Ltd&lt;/i&gt; [2006] SCA 75 (RSA) (SCA 31 May 2006 (case 364/05) unreported) is very important. The facts are fairly straightforward : On 13 November 2000, VOC Investment's computer system generated four cheques in favour of a payee, Damelin Textiles. All the cheques were drawn on the Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd and bore that date. The cheques were intended to be post-dated, but the computer system used for printing the cheques was not able to print post-dated cheques. So the date on each cheque was altered in manuscript to reflect the intended date of payment. The alterations were signed by the same two signatories who were authorized to draw the cheques on behalf of VOC Investment. After the dates were changed, the payee negotiated three of the cheques to Melamed Finance.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a25.pdf">
    <title>The law of persons and family law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a25.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Heaton, Jacqueline
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 885-960&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The Children's Act 38 of 2005 is one of the most important and far-reaching pieces of legislation in the area of the law of persons and family law in recent South African history. It radically changes aspects of the law of parent and child and extends the rights and protection that children enjoy. It also codifies aspects of the law of parent and child.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a26.pdf">
    <title>The law of property (including real security)</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a26.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Van Der Merwe, C.G.
Pienaar, J.M.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 961-1038&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The Minister of Land Affairs amended the definition of the deeds registry of Pretoria under section 1(1)(&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;)(iii) of the Deeds Registries Act 47 of 1937 by excluding the province of Mpumalanga from its jurisdictional area (GN 861 in &lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30288 of 28 September 2007). A new deeds registry was accordingly instituted in Nelspruit for the Mpumalanga province (GN 862 in &lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30288 of 28 September 2007).
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a27.pdf">
    <title>The law of purchase and sale</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a27.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Naude, T.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1039-1054&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;De Villiers v Potgieter &amp; others NNO&lt;/i&gt; 2007 (2) SA 311 (SCA) and &lt;i&gt;Bowring NO v Vrededorp Properties CC &amp; another&lt;/i&gt; 2007 (5) SA 391 (SCA),  which considered the doctrine of notice in the context of agreements of sale, are discussed in the chapter on the Law of Property. For a discussion of &lt;i&gt;Dream Supreme Properties 11 CC v Nedcor Bank Ltd &amp; others&lt;/i&gt; 2007 (4) 380 (SCA), see the under 'Sales in Execution' below.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a28.pdf">
    <title>The law of succession (including the administration of estates) and trusts</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a28.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
De Waal, M.J.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1055-1077&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Certain sections of the Children's Act 38 of 2005 came into operation on 1 July 2007 (Proc 13 &lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30030 of 29 June 2007) One of them is section 17, which lowers the age of majority from 21 to eighteen years. This amendment will have an effect on both section 1(6) of the Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987 and section 2C(1) of the  Wills Act 7 of 1953. These sections deal with the legal effect of the repudiation of benefits by minors under the circumstances set out there.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a29.pdf">
    <title>The law of taxation</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a29.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Surtees, Peter
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1078-1116&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; This is a summary of some of the income tax amendments introduced by the Revenue  Laws Amendment Act 35 of 2007, promulgated on 8 January 2008 (&lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30656), the Revenue Laws Second Amendment Act 36 of 2007, promulgated on 8 January 2008 (&lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30657), and the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 8 of 2007, promulgated on 8 August 2007 (&lt;i&gt;GG&lt;/i&gt; 30157). The summary does not purport to deal with all the amendments in detail.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a30.pdf">
    <title>Mining law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a30.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Dale, Michael O.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1117-1141&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In terms of the section 47 of the Revenue Laws Amendment Act 35 of 2007, section 37A of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 was amended by substituting section 37A(7). The effect of the amended section 37A(7) is to clarify that if any rehabilitation company or trust contravenes the provisions of section 37A(1)(&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;) by distributing property from that company or trust for a purpose other than rehabilitation purposes provided for in section 37A, an amount equal to the market value of the property so distributed must be deemed to be taxable income which accrued to such company or trust during the year of assessment in which such distribution occurred. Such a company or trust will thus lose the tax deduction offered  to rehabilitation companies or trusts and will be taxed in the normal course (see the discussion in A de Koker &lt;i&gt;Silke on South African Income Tax&lt;/i&gt; (1995) 6-18 - 3-4).
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a31.pdf">
    <title>Miscellaneous contracts (agency, carriage, deposit, donation, loan, partnership, service, and suretyship)</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a31.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Andanda, Pamela
Pretorius, J.T.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1142-1163&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In &lt;i&gt;Mano et Mano Ltd v Nationwide Airlines (Pty) Ltd &amp; others&lt;/i&gt; 2007 (2) SA  512 (SCA) the court had to address an issue that quite a number of authorities have considered and on which there is no dearth of authority. But what makes the decision important is its consideration of when an intervening factor is 'weighty' enough to deprive an agent of a claim to commission. The issue has previously been considered with regard to the sale of immovable property. Previous authorities have not, however, dealt with unique res such as an aircraft, which was the bone of contention in &lt;i&gt;Mano&lt;/i&gt;.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a32.pdf">
    <title>Public international law</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a32.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Botha, Neville
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1164-1182&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; As has become customary since 1994, South Africa was firmly on the treaty trail during 2007 with some 75 treaties being concluded (for a full list, see M Jacobs 'Treaties' (2007) 32 &lt;i&gt;SAYIL&lt;/i&gt; 539-43). The growing importance of South Africa's links with the Peoples' Republic of China is clearly evident with no less than eleven of these agreements having been signed between the two countries. These include, most notably, the Agreement on Economic and Technical Co-operation between the Republic of South Africa and the Peoples Republic of China, signed and entered into force on 6 February 2007, and the Protocol to the agreement signed on the same day.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a33.pdf">
    <title>Unjustified enrichment</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a33.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; 
Scott, Helen
Visser, Daniel
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1183-1186&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; In &lt;i&gt;St Helena Primary School v MEC, Department of Education, Free State Province&lt;/i&gt; 2007 (4) SA 16 (O), the facts were as follows : the first and second plaintiffs were a public school and its governing body, respectively (collectively, 'the school'). The first defendant was the member of the Provincial Government responsible for all educational matters in the Free State, while the second defendant was joined as the head of the Free State Provincial Government (collectively, 'the Department'). The school occupied premises owned by the Department by virtue of a licence (precario). Those premises were damaged by fire and repaired by the school. A claim for roughly two thirds of the cost of the repairs was successfully lodged with an insurance company, MF. The balance of the costs of repair was financed from other sources. MF then sought to recover the amount paid out from the Department on the basis of unjustified enrichment, relying on the doctrine of subrogation. An alternative plea of negotiorum gestio was abandoned.
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a34.pdf">
    <title>Index to sections</title>
    <link>http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/ju_assal/ju_assal_2007_a34.pdf</link>
    <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Vol &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Publication:&lt;/b&gt; 2007&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Page:&lt;/b&gt; 1187-1203&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Index to sections
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

