<?xml version='1.0'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='../../utils/article_abstract.xsl'?>
<article>
<title>Revenge and retribution in the twelve tables : talio esto reconsidered</title>
<author>
Tuori, Kaius 
</author><issn>
1021545X
</issn><volume>Volume 13</volume>
<issue>
Issue 2
</issue><pub_date>2007</pub_date>
<publisher>Sabinet Online</publisher>
<pages>140-145</pages>
<abstract>
Nearly every legal history textbook offers us a similar narrative of human development: In the beginning, man acted on his impulses and avenged physically all wrongs done to him. Of course it was difficult, if not impossible, for someone of low status to get his own back on someone rich and powerful. In contrast, enemies  of near equal standing would habitually embark on a vendetta, each avenging the    harm done to them and assuaging their feelings of anger. Theorists of early warfare saw the vendetta as the starting-point of war and thus the ruin of mankind.   
</abstract><access_link>http://search.sabinet.co.za/WebZ/Authorize?sessionid=0&amp;bad=http://search.sabinet.co.za/ejour/ejour_badsearch.html&amp;portal=ejournal&amp;next=images/ejour/funda/funda_v13_n2_a9.pdf</access_link>
<ecommerce_link>http://ecom.sabinet.co.za</ecommerce_link>

</article>